Structured OJT met an identified training need in
both countries.
In Zimbabwe, most of the sites trained the expected
number of participants. All Kenyan OJT sites were able to train more
participants than had been planned for the pilot test.15 At the site in
Kenya where 7 participants were trained, the participants stated that
having a colleague to work with during the course, to practice role plays
and to study together was a real advantage.16
OJT participants were able to practice much more on the
anatomic model and to insert many more IUDs on clients prior to
qualification than participants in Kenya’s 6-week, group-based FP
course. Preceptors and DTC trainers reported that OJT-trained providers
had better skills than those who were group-based trained. This finding
was verified during clinical skills assessment visits made by DPHC
trainers (Cege 1997).
At all 6 sites in Kenya, hospital nursing officers had
lists of more than 20 people who were waiting to be trained in the
"next" IUD OJT program. Zimbabwe OJT supervisors also had
waiting lists and efforts were made to continue the IUD structured OJT
program.17 These continuation efforts clearly demonstrate that a structured
OJT program is able to respond to the needs of the work site. And,
responding directly to work site needs is increasingly critical as
countries become more and more decentralized.
The structured OJT program builds commitment and
motivation to the learning process.
In this pilot test, all the participants who were
selected were very interested in being trained. Structured OJT programs
allow for a more targeted selection of participants. Targeted selection
ensures that those being trained are motivated because they will be
trained in the skills they need to use in their work setting.
Structured OJT provides a mentoring environment for
trainers.
An unexpected benefit of the OJT program in Kenya was
that OJT trainers were found to have better coaching and demonstration
skills than clinical preceptors who teach only during group-based courses.
OJT trainers may have better skills in these areas because they are more
familiar with the course content and have long periods of practice
(supervised by the OJT supervisor) in these skills.18
The structured OJT approach would be useful for
training in a variety of health topics.
The participants were interested in the structured OJT
process and the access to learning. They felt the approach could be useful
for learning other skills/information. In Zimbabwe, one site began using
the same kind of training approach to train service providers in the
provision of diaphragms. RH professionals from Kenya, Zambia and several
other countries are already developing a structured OJT program for
preparing providers to deliver postabortion care (PAC) services. In both
Zimbabwe and Kenya, the following question has yet to be resolved: Would
participants be motivated/stimulated for training without the
certification incentive that was included in the IUD training?
Retention of competency after training needs to be
planned for before the training program is implemented.
Structured OJT programs allow providers to acquire new
skills and improve their performance in locations where caseload for the
new service may be low. Therefore, in low-caseload areas, it is important
that the structured OJT program includes a country-specific plan which
provides for regular practice on anatomic models after qualification so
that skills can be retained.
An expanded group of trainers is needed but
transferring OJT skills to additional OJT trainers requires a mixed
training approach.
It is possible to transfer OJT trainer skills to new
trainers using an on-the-job approach although it may be more efficient to
train trainers periodically in a group-based training course. In Kenya,
the OJT team felt that having at least 2 OJT trainers and 2 OJT
supervisors for every site was very important to ensure that training
continued uninterrupted when trainers and supervisors were sick or on
leave. (Trainers in both countries felt that they needed a 1-month break
between training periods.) Following the pilot phase, a group-based
training was conducted to train an additional trainer and supervisor from
the pilot sites.
In addition to the OJT trainer who was trained in the
job setting at one site in Kenya, OJT trainers have found that many
graduates of the OJT program have begun assisting them to conduct training
almost as soon as their own training is completed. At one site, the first
OJT participant to complete the course was transferred to a nearby health
center. After the OJT supervisor visited the health center to deliver
equipment and resource materials and to assess the OJT graduate’s
skills, the graduate initiated her own OJT program. Because OJT
participants are much more familiar with the course materials than
group-based course graduates, and because the skills component is truly
competency-based, pilot testing an on-the-job training-of-trainers course
for graduates of the OJT program may be feasible.
Implementing an OJT program does not obviate the need
for group-based training—either for training trainers or training other
participants. It does, however, allow more efficient use of training
resources by ensuring that funds are allocated for group-based training
only where and when this type of training is needed.
Mechanisms need to be explored for the support of
visits by the OJT supervisor to district sites to initiate training and
certify participants.
In both countries, OJT supervisors are being asked to
travel to additional sites to provide training support and to certify
providers at the end of training. The OJT expansion sites in Kenya include
hospitals and health centers that are at a considerable distance from the
OJT supervisors’ location. Because the Kenya program is intended to be
self-financing, the new sites have been asked either to send transport to
pick up the OJT supervisors or to pay for public transport out of their
cost-sharing funds. (This part of the structured OJT program is still in
its infancy so whether this approach is a feasible way to expand OJT to
many more sites is not yet known.) In Zimbabwe, discussions about how to
ensure efficient use of trainers have been held.
Once a critical mass of providers is trained,
selection criteria may need to be reviewed.
In Kenya, for example, if OJT expands to include
pre-1992 graduates of the basic FP 6-week course, general FP skills may be
a problem. Selection criteria as well as the OJT program itself should be
reviewed to ensure that revisions are made, when necessary, to meet the
needs of changing provider characteristics.
Funding constraints precluded a longer-term
evaluation that would have compared IUD service providers trained in
different training approaches.
Originally, the pilot test in Zimbabwe was expected to
include a level 3 training evaluation (change in job performance) of IUD
service providers that would compare and contrast the various training
approaches (group-based, structured OJT, computer-assisted learning
approaches). This evaluation was not feasible for a variety of reasons
that were related to logistics and funding. Discussions about conducting
this type of evaluation in Kenya are ongoing.
The pilot test of the IUD structured OJT program in
both Zimbabwe and Kenya was very successful. It was especially successful
in Kenya where it stimulated and transferred to the provinces a
decentralized responsibility for FP skills training. The various models of
the structured OJT approach that were applied in Zimbabwe and Kenya
demonstrated its flexibility as a learning approach that could be adapted
to various work settings. Additional efforts in sexually transmitted
infection (STI) and PAC training are also showing that the flexibility and
responsiveness of structured OJT can improve provider performance and
ensure the delivery of quality services.
At the country level, continuation and expansion of structured OJT will
ensure that resources invested thus far are maximized. JHPIEGO is
continuing to promote the structured OJT approach along with other
learning approaches. Structured OJT is also being used as a guide for
other training interventions such as the Zimbabwe and Kenya preservice
nursing programs where the Student Clinical Placement Guide has
been modeled on the OJT program.
15At one site where the OJT
trainer-designate was unable to attend the OJT training-of-trainers
course, the OJT supervisor trained the trainer using an on-the-job
approach. The trainer’s skills were assessed by a DPHC trainer who
authorized her to begin training, and she trained 4 service providers
during the pilot test. At another site, the OJT trainer died less than a
year after the initial training-of-trainers course, but the OJT supervisor
continued training the third participant.
16These participants also
acted as clients with each other in role plays so they could practice
counseling; then they did an IUD insertion on the ZOE model. At this site,
the OJT supervisor’s very active involvement in the training process may
explain this site’s ability to train so many participants.
17After the JHPIEGO program
closeout in late 1997 in Zimbabwe, JHPIEGO staff were unable to track the
continuation of the program.
18During the recent
implementation of a self-directed FP learning program for nursing
students, OJT sites had a smoother transition to the new system because
they were already familiar with a self-directed learning process (Smith
and Brechin 1998).