|

Recommendations for Contraceptive Use |
|
|
|
|
NORPLANT® Implants |
Q.4. Are there any age/parity
restrictions on NORPLANT® Implants?
|
|
|
| a) No. NORPLANT® Implants may
be used at any age at which the woman is at risk for pregnancy (e.g., past menarche and
through menopause). |
a) The contraceptive effect of
NORPLANT® Implants ceases within 24 hours of removal and return to fertility is
comparable to that of women who have not used contraception; 40 to 50% of women become
pregnant after three months and 75 to 95% of women are pregnant by 12 months post-removal.
- Noerpramana N-P. The Norplant removal
training and service at Dr. Kariadi Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia. Advances in
Contraception December 1991; 7(4):389-401.
- Sivin I, Diaz S, Holma P,
Alvarez-Saneuez F, Robertson DN. A four-year clinical study of Norplants. Studies in
Family Planning 1983;14(6-7):184-191.
- Singh K, Viegas OAC, Ratnam SS. A
three-year evaluation of Norplant in Singaporean acceptors. Advances in Contraception
1990;6:1-9.
|
| Older Women: |
|
| b) NORPLANT® Implants may be
used by women through menopause. |
b) Many providers consider
NORPLANT® Implants to be an especially appropriate method for older women, since they
contain no estrogen.
- Norplant Contraceptive Subdermal
Implants: Managerial and Technical Guidelines. Geneva, World Health Organization,
1990.
Because women greater than 35 years of age are at
increasing risk for endometrial (and ovarian) cancer, it is particularly important to:
- carefully evaluate irregular bleeding before inserting
NORPLANT® Implants and
- more carefully consider cancer as a possible cause if the
woman returns with irregular bleeding after prolonged amenorrhea.
- Herbst AL, Mishell DR, Stenchever MA,
Droegmueller W. Comprehensive Gynecology, 2nd edition. St. Louis, Mosby Year Book,
1992, pp 1082-1083.
- Parazzini F, La Vecchia C, Bocciolone
L, Franceshi S. The epidemiology of endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 1991;41:1-16.
|
| Adolescents: |
|
| c) Use of NORPLANT® Implants
leads to amenorrhea in a small proportion of women, less than that for women using
progestin-only injectables. Some evidence suggests that a hypoestrogenic state within the
first two years after menarche may increase the risk of osteoporosis later in life,
particularly for women with other risk factors for osteoporosis (i.e., women who are
small-boned, underweight, white or Asian, smokers or malnourished). However, for those
adolescents age 15 or under, for whom NORPLANT® Implants is the most appropriate method,
the benefits of the method generally outweigh the risks. |
c) Amenorrhea, while on
progestin-only contraceptives, is generally evidence of lower estrogen levels (although
not as low as menopausal levels). Estrogen is necessary for the development and
maintenance of strong bones (to prevent osteoporosis). The peak strength (density) of
spinal bone is reached by girls around age 16; the greatest increase in bone density
occurs in the first two years post-menarche.
- Faśndes A, Alvarez-Sanchez F, Brache
V, Jimenez E, Tejada AS. Hormonal changes associated with bleeding during low dose
progestogen contraception delivered by Norplant subdermal implants. Advances in
Contraception 1991;7(1):85-94.
- Shoupe D, Mishell DR, Bopp BL,
Fielding M. The significance of bleeding patterns in Norplant implant users. Obstetrics
and Gynecology 1991;77:256-260.
- Bonjour JP, Theintz G, Buchs B,
Slosman D, Rizzoli R. Critical years and stages of puberty for spinal and femoral bone
mass accumulation during adolescence. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism
1991; 73: 555-563.
- Theintz G, Buchs B, Rizzoli R, Slosman
D, Clavien H, Sizonenko PC, Bonjour JP. Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation
in healthy adolescents: Evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the
levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism 1992;75:1060-1065.
- Dhuper S, Warren M, Brooks-Gunn J, Fox
R. Effects of hormonal status on bone density in adolescent girls. Journal of Clinical
Endocrinology and Metabolism 1990;71:1083-1088.
|
|