Related Health Topics

Maximizing Access and Quality of Services
Issue No. 1, January 1995

esalogo_sm.gif (620 bytes)

continued from pg 3

New World Health Organization Classification System2

From March 7–11, 1994, a scientific working group of 26 reproductive health experts from 16 countries met at the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva, Switzerland, to review current clinical and epidemiological data on selected methods of contraception. As a result, the group has issued a draft report, Improving Access to Quality Care in Family Planning. Eligibility Criteria for Initiating Use of Selected Methods of Contraception, to provide guidance to policy makers, family planning program managers and the scientific community in updating the eligibility criteria for the initiation of low-dose combined oral contraceptives (COCs), progestin-only oral contraceptives, DMPA, Norplant implants and copper-containing IUDs. The final draft of this report will be printed and circulated widely in approximately one to two months.

All available clinical and epidemiological data were carefully reviewed to weigh the risk-benefit ratio of using each method in the presence of specific "conditions." "Conditions" were defined as both a woman's characteristics (e.g., age, history of pregnancy) and known preexisting medical/pathological conditions (e.g., diabetes, hypertension). The presence of conditions affecting eligibility for use of a contraceptive method were ranked according to the following four categories:

  1. A condition for which there is no restriction for the use of the contraceptive method
  2. A condition where the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven risks
  3. A condition where the theoretical or proven risks usually outweigh the advantages of using the method
  4. A condition which represents an unacceptable health risk associated with the use of the contraceptive method

Based on this classification system, a three-column table format was developed which classifies eligibility criteria for initiating use of specific methods. Column one of the table specifies the condition being considered.

Column two classifies the condition into one of the four categories described above ranging from one to four. Column three gives a brief rationale for the classification assigned.

These tables may serve as a guide to the service provider. For example, if a client presents with hypertension, malaria or sickle cell disease, and the initiation of low-dose COCs (containing <50 µg of ethinyl estradiol) is being considered, the following table would apply:

CONDITION

CATEGORY

RATIONALE/COMMENTS
Essential Hypertension
  • Mild hypertension (<180/105)
2 COC causes only small changes in blood pressure among non-hypertensive women. Primary concern is risk of underlying vascular disease and additional risk of thromboembolism.

The health risk/benefit ratio is dependent upon the severity of the condition.

  • Moderate and severe hypertension
3
  • Vascular disease
3/4
Malaria

1

Not relevant for eligibility for this contraceptive method. No need for restriction of COC use.
Sickle Cell Disease

3

Women with sickle cell disease are at increased risk of thrombosis.

The working group also developed a table format that classifies eligibility criteria by condition for all of the methods considered. For example:

CONDITION

COC1

POP2

DMPA3

NORPLANT

IUD

Age
  <40=1 <16=2 <16=2 <16=2 <20=2
  >40=2 >16=1 >16=1 >16=1 >20=1
Parity
  • Nulliparous
1 1 1 1 2
  • Parous
1 1 1 1 1
STDs: current or within three months

1

1

1

1

4

HIV/AIDS
  • HIV+
1 1 1

1

3
  • High risk of HIV
1 1 1 1 3
  • AIDS
1 1 1 1 3

1 Combined oral contraceptive 2Progestin-only pill 3Depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (injectable)

This WHO classification system is intended to be adapted for use at the country-program level. For example, the four-category classification system, which would be appropriate for use where the necessary clinical judgment could be provided, may be simplified into a two-category (yes/no) system for use in situations where clinical judgment is limited, such as in community-based services.

CLASSIFICATION

WITH CLINICAL JUDGMENT

WITH LIMITED CLINICAL JUDGMENT

1

Use method in any circumstances.

Yes

2

Generally use the method.

Yes

3

Use of method not usually recommended unless other more appropriate methods are not available or acceptable.

No

4

Method not to be used.

No

For the future, WHO will collaborate with other international agencies to address medical criteria for both initiation and continuation of all available contraceptive methods, including levonorgestrel IUDs, NET-EN, combined once-a-month injectables, barrier methods, female and male sterilization, natural family planning, withdrawal, and emergency postcoital oral contraceptive regimen.

2 World Health Organization (WHO). Improving Access to Quality Care in Family Planning. Eligibility Criteria for Initiating Use of Selected Methods of Contraception: Combined oral contraceptives, Progestin only pills, DMPA, Norplant implants and Copper IUDs. Draft Report. Geneva, WHO, November 1994.

continued on pg. 5

Back to MAQ Bulletins


| Home | Family Planning | Maternal & Neonatal Health | Cervical CancerRelated Health Topics
Tools for Trainers
| Reading Room | Related Links | Search ReproLine | Website Tools

Quick Search 

Website design copyright © 1995-2003 by JHPIEGO Corporation. All rights reserved.

Last Updated: 09 Jul 2003

URL: http://www.reproline.jhu.edu/
Reproductive Health Online (ReproLine): a family planning and reproductive health training website