Background
|
| placeholderplacehol |
Misoprostol is a synthetic PGE1 analogue which is available in tablet
form. It is closely related to other prostaglandins used in obstetrical practice such as
Dinoprostone (PGE2), Carboprost (15 methylPGF2alpha), Gemeprost (PGE1) and Sulprostone
(PGE2 analogue). Misoprostol was developed and marketed for prevention of peptic ulcer
disease caused by prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, but with its potent uterotonic and
cervical ripening activity has found applications in the management of gynecological and
obstetrical problems. In the United States it has been marketed as Cytotec, with 100 and
200 mcg tablets available. Misoprostol:
is inexpensive (US$.36 per 100 mcg);
is easily stored (shelf life 7 years);
has, in comparison with other prostaglandins, minimal effects on
cardiovascular and bronchial tree smooth muscle (can be safely used in hypertensive
patients and asthmatics);
is not affected by ambient temperature; and
- needs no refrigeration, needles or syringes for its storage and administration.
|
|
 |
Mechanism of Action
|
|
Misoprostol is a myometrial stimulant which binds to E-2 and E-3
prostanoid receptors. Its active plasma metabolite is misoprostolic acid. It is rapidly
absorbed after oral, vaginal and rectal administration. With oral administration the half
life is less than 30 minutes, and peak level is at 15 minutes. After vaginal
administration, there is a gradual rise to a maximum level at 60120 minutes, but at
240 minutes the level is still at 60 percent of peak level (see below).
Comparative Effectiveness of Vaginal and Oral Administration of
Misoprostol
- More side effects with oral use
- At similar dose:
- 95% (vaginal) success vs. 87% (oral) in first trimester
- Failure 1% (vaginal) vs. 7% (oral)
- Abortion within 4 hours: 93% (vaginal) vs. 78% (oral)
|
Source: El Refaey et al 1995.
It is assumed that rectal administration results in a similar profile. Vaginal dosing
therefore can take place with longer intervals than oral dosing for similar desired
uterine effect, and accumulation above "safe" levels with undesirable side
effects can take place. With oral and vaginal dosing of up to 400 mg every 8 hours, no
accumulation has been noted and no accumulation has been seen with a maximum of three
doses of 400 mcg 3 hours apart. Potential hypertonus as a result of drug accumulation
could lead to:
uterine rupture in the second or third trimester,
fetal distress in the third trimester, and
high rates of nausea and diarrhea in all trimesters.
For obstetrical use, the vaginal application has been studied the most. Misoprostol in
the first and second trimesters is an effective pregnancy termination agent either as a
single agent or as an adjunct to methotrexate or mifepristone. Misoprostol will
effectively dilate the cervix prior to surgical abortion. Misoprostol has been studied as
a cervical ripening and induction agent in the last two trimesters. Its use as an
alternative to MVA or suction curettage for management of incomplete abortion (first
trimester), as a uterotonic agent in the active management in third stage and as a
treatment of postpartum hemorrhage are currently being studied.
Applications of Misoprostol
- Cervical priming prior to surgical abortion
- Labor induction 24 weeks to term
- Alone/adjunct for medical abortion
- Management of spontaneous abortion?
- Management of uterine atony
|
Misoprostol offers a potentially inexpensive treatment for life threatening bleeding in
pregnancy in developing countries in the hands of frontline healthcare workers. |
|
 |
Research Results
|
|
The following section summarizes the status of misoprostol use in early
pregnancy.
Fong et al (1998) demonstrated that 400 mcg vaginal misoprostol will
dilate the cervix to more than 8 mm in 96.7 percent of patients when it is given up to 3
hours or more prior to suction curettage in the first trimester.
Carbonell et al (1997b) demonstrated that for gestations less than 63
days, misoprostol, given in a dose of 800 mcg vaginally and repeated at 48 and 96 hours,
resulted in a 92 percent complete abortion rate, with 77 percent complete after one dose
and an additional 13.7 percent after the second dose; there was a failure rate of 8
percent. Hausknecht (1995), Creinin et al (1995) and Carbonell et al (1997a) all reported
a 9096 percent complete abortion rate with methotrexate followed by misoprostol at
3, 5 and 7 days in a dose of 800 mcg; 20 percent of patients required two or three doses.
In a review of the literature, Grimes (1997) concluded that class I
evidence and class A recommendations for first trimester abortion existed for misoprostol
as the most effective prostaglandin, either as a single agent or as an adjunct (most
effective at the seventh day) to mifepristone or methotrexate.
El Refaey et al (1995) compared oral and vaginal doses and found vaginal
misoprostol use resulted in fewer failures.
These studies clearly establish misoprostol as an effective agent to "empty"
the pregnant uterus in the first trimester. One could assume similar effectiveness when it
is given for a "failed" pregnancy or missed abortion. Blood loss in all of these
studies was acceptable and comparable to blood loss during surgical abortion.
Misoprostol is associated with birth defects in "continuing pregnancies," and
this is an obvious concern with unsupervised use.
Failed Induction Using Misoprostol
- Congenital defect
- Moebius Syndrome
- Limb reduction defect
- Mechanism of action
- Placental bed ischemia
- Embryonic vascular disruption
|
Source: Gonzalez et al 1998; Hofmeyr et al 1998; Pastuszak et al
1998.
This association is confirmed by several studies in Brazil, where misoprostol is
readily available over the counter. Moebius syndrome, characterized by equinovarus,
cranial nerve defects, arthrogryposis and terminal limb defects, has been described with
exposure to a failed single dose of 800 mcg. Localized ischemia in the placental bed and
vascular disruption in the embryo are postulated as the operational mechanism for causing
the congenital anomalies. |
|
 |
Misoprostol Use in Incomplete Abortion
|
|
So far, only five studies regarding the use of misoprostol for incomplete
abortion have appeared in the peer review literature. Studies regarding the management of
incomplete abortion must be considered against the natural history and expectant
management of this condition and its complications. Nielsen and Hahlin (1995), comparing
surgical evacuation and expectant management over a 72-hour period, reported that
completed abortion occurred in 70 percent of cases in the expectant management group. The
complication rate was also lower in the expectant management group (3 percent) compared to
the surgical treatment group (11 percent). In a pilot study of 20 patients, Creinin, Moyer
and Guido (1997) found an 800 mcg vaginal dose more effective than a 400 mcg oral dose,
with 88 percent complete evacuation. As shown in Table 1 below, Chung et al (1997)
in two prospective observational studies (none prospectively randomized) found that 66
percent and 79 percent of patients managed over a 48-hour period with 400 mcg misoprostol
orally in three doses did not require a curettage. A reference group had immediate sharp
curettage (D&C) and the complication rates (infection, repeat curettage) were higher
in the curettage group. Blood loss was not systematically evaluated.
Table 1. Misoprostol for Incomplete Abortion
PROTOCOL |
RESULTS |
354 cases by ultrasound
- 225 products of conception (POC)
- 102 empty uterus
137 reference cases
Misoprostol
- Orally
- 400 mcg every 4 hours for three doses
D&C if incomplete after 48 hours |
Completion rate: 70.6%
- 101 in < 24 hours
- 148 in < 48 hours
|
| Misoprostol group
No difference in blood loss and transfusion needs
Complications
- Misoprostol 1.7%
- D&C 6.6%
|
Reference D&C
- 4 repeat D&C
- 3 infections
|
Source: Chung et al 1997.
The only prospective randomized study in the literature (Herabutya and O-Prasertsawat
1997) compared 200 mcg of misoprostol and placebo over a 24-hour period prior to suction
curettage (see below).
Data from Studies of
Misoprostol and Missed Abortion |
- Randomized study
- 24-hour observation prior to suction curettage
- < 14 weeks missed abortion
- 42: 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol
- 42: placebo
- Spontaneous abortion (p< 0.0001)
- 30 vaginal misoprostol
- 6 placebo
|
- No information on blood loss
- Complications
- 3 in placebo group: bleeding, perforation
- 0 in misoprostol group
- Reduces need for suction curettage
|
Source: Herabutya and O-Prasertsawat 1997.
Thirty out of 42 patients (71 percent) in the misoprostol group had a spontaneous
abortion, versus six out of 42 in the placebo group. All complications were in the placebo
group (bleeding and perforation in three), none in the misoprostol group. No systemic
evaluation of blood loss or hematocrit changes was undertaken.
In the Chung et al (1995, 1997) and Herabutya and O-Prasertsawat (1997) studies, the
diagnosis of incomplete abortion was made by transvaginal ultrasound. In the second Chung
et al study, about one third of the patients with a clinical diagnosis of incomplete
abortion had an empty uterus and did not need any treatment.
Chipcase and James (1997) demonstrated in a randomized trial of expectant management of
surgical versus expectant management of spontaneous abortion that with less than 50 mm
tissue present on ultrasound, curettage is probably not necessary. None of these studies
found an increased risk of infection with the use of misoprostol. Indirect evidence from
an analysis of postabortion complications in Brazil found a lower incidence of infections
after self-administered misoprostol use than after other means of inducing abortion.
Misoprostol in First Trimester: Increased Infection Rate?
- Analysis in Brazil of admission to "postabortion" complication ward
- History of misoprostol use
- No history of misoprostol use
|
Source: Faundes et al 1996. |
|
 |
|